Musk Criticizes Trump’s New Perfume Line for Its Cheap Scent and Quality

In a surprising twist of events, rumors have surfaced that Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur known for his ventures with Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink, has criticized the newly launched perfume line by none other than former President Donald Trump.

The fragrance, named “Victory 45-47,” symbolizes Trump’s two terms in office and was introduced with great fanfare in July 2025. However, the product’s unveiling has been overshadowed by claims that Musk, who is said to have a close relationship with Trump, disparaged the perfume's quality.

According to unverified sources, Musk is said to have made disparaging remarks about the scent of Trump’s perfume, describing it as “cheap” and “too industrial.”

He reportedly suggested that the fragrance might appeal to those with a fondness for scents associated with mass-produced, lower-end products, and that it could not compare to the high-end fragrances that Musk is known to prefer. 

The source of this information has not been officially confirmed, but it has certainly stirred up public curiosity and speculation. This unexpected criticism has set off a firestorm of reactions, particularly since Trump himself has touted the perfume as a symbol of victory, power, and success.

The former president’s promotional campaign for “Victory 45-47” emphasized these qualities, positioning the fragrance as a must-have for anyone who wants to embrace the strength and success that Trump claims to represent.

However, Musk’s alleged comments have fueled doubts about the perfume’s true quality, especially when compared to luxury perfumes with a much higher price tag. Musk’s remarks have led many to wonder whether they are simply part of an ongoing strategy to create buzz or if they reflect a genuine disappointment with the product.

Given Musk’s long-standing public persona as a connoisseur of high-end goods, his critique of Trump’s perfume has raised eyebrows. The idea that Musk, whose wealth and influence place him in an elite class of consumers, would openly mock a product linked to Trump has only deepened the intrigue surrounding this peculiar exchange.

While Trump continues to market the fragrance as the embodiment of victory and strength, Musk’s comments have inevitably shifted the public discourse. The stark contrast between the two men’s views on what constitutes quality and luxury highlights the growing divide between them, despite their past cooperation.

Musk has been a major player in the tech world, renowned for his forward-thinking and pioneering work in industries ranging from electric vehicles to space travel, and it is no surprise that he would hold higher standards when it comes to luxury items.

The issue of quality is not the only aspect of the perfume’s debut that has attracted attention. The launch of “Victory 45-47” has been positioned as more than just a fragrance—it's presented as a brand statement, an extension of Trump’s personal legacy.

For many, it’s symbolic of the former president’s branding power, his ability to create a marketable product out of almost anything related to his name. However, Musk’s sharp critique could undermine this narrative, casting a shadow over the perfume’s reputation and raising questions about the authenticity of the brand’s values.

The public exchange of barbs between Musk and Trump over a fragrance may seem trivial to some, but it speaks to larger issues of branding, perception, and the public personas of the two men.

Musk’s image is that of a visionary entrepreneur who doesn’t shy away from challenging established norms and taking risks—qualities that are often celebrated in his various ventures.

Trump, on the other hand, has built a reputation as a larger-than-life figure who has used his name to create a vast array of products, from real estate to personal care items like the new perfume. The clash between these two powerful figures raises questions about authenticity in branding, and who gets to define what luxury and success truly mean.

Musk’s alleged comments have fueled speculations about the nature of his relationship with Trump. While the two have shared a cordial relationship in the past, including Musk’s high-profile support for Trump’s re-election campaign, their current dynamic appears to be shifting.

Musk, known for his unconventional style and outspoken opinions, may have felt the need to challenge Trump’s brand, especially in light of their growing political and ideological differences.

Musk’s public persona, which often contrasts with Trump’s, makes this latest interaction all the more intriguing. Musk’s critiques could be seen as an attempt to distance himself from Trump’s influence or as part of a larger strategy to define his own path separate from the former president.

The timing of Musk’s comments also adds to the intrigue. The perfume was launched amid a period of increasing scrutiny of Trump’s business ventures, with many questioning the long-term viability of his post-presidency brand.

Musk’s remarks, whether intentional or not, serve as a reminder that Trump’s brand is not immune to criticism, even from those who have previously been allies or collaborators. This could mark a turning point in their relationship, with Musk positioning himself as a critical voice in Trump’s increasingly controversial empire.

As for the perfume itself, the controversy surrounding it has likely done more to raise its profile than any marketing campaign could have achieved. In a world where products are often defined by their celebrity endorsements and public reception, the rivalry between Musk and Trump has sparked widespread interest in a fragrance that otherwise might have gone unnoticed.

Whether this attention translates into significant sales for “Victory 45-47” remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the public’s focus is now firmly on the clash between two of the most influential figures in modern business and politics.

Musk’s critique also raises larger questions about the intersection of business and politics, particularly in the world of high-profile public figures.

The lines between personal branding, product marketing, and political influence are increasingly blurred, with figures like Musk and Trump using their influence to shape public perception and generate profit. 

Musk’s criticism of Trump’s perfume serves as a stark reminder that, even in a world dominated by billionaires and powerful personalities, there are still moments when even the most well-crafted brands can be vulnerable to external critique.

In conclusion, the rumor that Elon Musk has criticized Donald Trump’s new perfume line has sparked a significant amount of public attention and speculation.

Whether it’s a calculated move by Musk to create buzz or a genuine expression of disappointment in the product, the incident highlights the complexities of modern branding and the influence of powerful figures in the public eye. 

As the rivalry between Musk and Trump continues to unfold, it will be fascinating to see how their respective brands—one rooted in technology and innovation, the other in populism and political legacy—continue to shape public discourse and influence the marketplace.

For now, the “Victory 45-47” perfume will remain a symbol of more than just fragrance—it’s a symbol of the ongoing battle for control over public perception in a world where branding is as important as product quality.