A bombshell discovery has emerged this week revealing that new evidence from the long-standing Trump-Russia investigation may connect Democratic donor George Soros to the infamous "Russiagate" conspiracy.
The findings, discovered deep within a classified FBI facility, suggest that Soros' Open Society Foundation may have played a crucial role in circulating unfounded claims of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
This discovery centers around what’s been dubbed the "burn bags" found inside a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) within FBI headquarters.
These bags, designated for destruction, were reportedly filled with sensitive materials related to the investigation, including a classified appendix from Special Counsel John Durham’s report on the investigation into Russian meddling.
The appendix, which has never been disclosed before, allegedly highlights an alarming connection between the Open Society Foundation and the FBI’s efforts to advance claims of Russian interference—claims that have been a constant source of division in American politics.
At the heart of the new findings is the suggestion that Soros and his network were instrumental in setting up the framework for the Russiagate narrative well before the FBI’s official investigation, “Crossfire Hurricane,” began.
According to CIA Director John Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel, the discovery of these documents sheds light on the behind-the-scenes efforts to weaponize intelligence against President Donald Trump.
Despite longstanding conservative claims that the Russiagate scandal was politically motivated, this new evidence appears to confirm that there were coordinated efforts by certain high-level figures in the intelligence community and political spheres to tie Trump to Russian interference.
The burn bags, which were found in a secure part of the FBI’s headquarters, were reportedly full of confidential materials that had been intended for destruction.
Among the documents was a secret appendix from John Durham's investigation, which reportedly includes key details about the FBI's actions during the early days of the Trump-Russia narrative.
While the full contents of the appendix remain classified, the information that has come to light has drawn immediate attention for its striking implications.
One of the most significant revelations is the alleged connection between George Soros' Open Society Foundation and the Russian hacking operation that became central to the investigation.
The appendix reveals that the emails of Soros' Foundation were allegedly hacked by Russian actors in 2016, providing new insight into the origins of the Trump-Russia claims.
The two hacked emails, reportedly sent by Leonard Bernardo, who was the regional director for Eurasia at the Open Society Foundations, are a key part of the puzzle.
According to the document, these emails show an effort to manipulate U.S. political discourse through misinformation about the Trump campaign’s supposed ties to Russia.
The emails, which were intercepted from the Open Society Foundations’ servers, show an unsettling pattern of coordination to spread anti-Trump rhetoric in the run-up to the 2016 election.
One email, attributed to Bernardo, includes a disturbing plan to disseminate fabricated information about Trump’s links to Russian hackers.
"During the first stage of the campaign, due to lack of direct evidence, it was decided to disseminate the necessary information through the FBI-affiliated technical structures," Bernardo reportedly wrote.
"In particular, through companies such as Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect, from where the information would then be disseminated through leading U.S. publications."
This strategy points to the growing concerns among political analysts that there was a concerted effort from multiple factions within the intelligence community to link President Trump to Russian interference.
According to the leaked emails, the narrative surrounding the Russia investigation was intentionally designed to gain traction in the media, starting with well-placed leaks.
What’s most alarming about the new evidence is how the media appears to have been strategically involved in the spread of false narratives surrounding Trump and Russia.
As the emails from Bernardo suggest, the plan to demonize Trump and Putin was not only well-coordinated within intelligence circles but was also intended to fuel media coverage that would damage Trump’s presidential bid.
One email describes how the Clinton campaign, particularly advisor Julie, was in favor of pushing the Trump-Russia narrative as a means of shifting attention away from Hillary Clinton’s own email scandal.
"The media analysis on the DNC hacking appears solid," wrote Bernardo in another email. "Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. Now it is good for a post-convention bounce."
The implication here is clear: the Trump-Russia narrative was not just an intelligence operation, but a political maneuver designed to undermine Trump’s legitimacy in the eyes of the American public.
The leaks from the Open Society Foundation’s emails suggest that Hillary Clinton’s campaign played a significant role in fueling this narrative.
On July 31, 2016, just days after these emails were sent, the FBI opened its Crossfire Hurricane investigation into the Trump campaign. The new evidence reveals that, even before this formal investigation began, certain officials were already priming the media and the public for a narrative of Russian interference.
These early steps to frame Trump as compromised by foreign interests appear to have been set into motion well before any substantial evidence had been gathered.
For many, this revelation raises serious questions about the motivations behind the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s ties to Russia. Critics have long alleged that the Russiagate investigation was politically motivated, and the discovery of these documents appears to lend credence to these claims.
While the details are still emerging, it is clear that this new evidence casts a shadow over the entire investigation.
The impact of these findings is far-reaching. For one, they provide new ammunition for critics of Soros, who has long been a target of conservative conspiracy theories.
While much of the focus in recent years has been on Soros’ financial backing of liberal causes and his support for progressive movements, this new information suggests that his influence may have extended into the realm of national security and intelligence operations.
For others, these revelations confirm their suspicions about the depths to which the intelligence community and political elites were willing to go to undermine President Trump’s candidacy.
With each new leak and revelation, the case for the politicization of Russiagate grows stronger, leading many to demand accountability from the individuals who were involved in these covert efforts.
As more details emerge from the investigation into these classified burn bags and their contents, the American public will likely face new questions about the legitimacy of the Trump-Russia narrative.
The newly disclosed documents, along with the explosive emails from Soros’ network, are sure to keep this controversy at the forefront of political discourse for years to come.
Moving forward, it remains to be seen what actions, if any, will be taken to hold those responsible accountable for their roles in this scandal. As of now, key figures like Soros, Clinton campaign members, and FBI officials may find themselves facing a fresh round of scrutiny as this controversy continues to unfold.
In the meantime, the American public is left to grapple with the disturbing implications of these new findings, which suggest that the Trump-Russia investigation may have been part of a far broader and more coordinated effort than originally thought.
Whether this new evidence will lead to legal repercussions or simply add to the ongoing political divide remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the story of Russiagate is far from over.
