Rep. McIver Indicted for Obstructing ICE Arrest and Democrats’ Disregard for Law and Order

   

Statements on the charges against LaMonica McIver - New Jersey Globe

In a bold move by the Trump administration, Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) has been hit with a federal indictment following an incident outside the Newark immigration detention center on May 9.

The charges against McIver, a Democratic congresswoman, are a stark reminder of the deep divisions in American politics and the lengths to which some Democrats will go to obstruct the rule of law and undermine law enforcement.

This indictment is not just about one individual; it is indicative of a broader problem within the Democratic Party, which seems increasingly willing to engage in disruptive and unlawful behavior for political gain.

U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced the three-count indictment against McIver, charging her with forcibly obstructing federal officers during a confrontation outside the Delaney Hall immigration facility in Newark.

The incident occurred during a congressional oversight visit that coincided with an immigration protest, which highlights the political nature of the entire event.

McIver and two other members of Congress were there as part of their oversight duties, but the situation quickly escalated when Newark Mayor Ras Baraka attempted to enter the facility’s secured area.

According to the Department of Justice’s press release, federal agents warned Baraka to leave the restricted area. When officers attempted to arrest him, McIver allegedly obstructed their efforts by putting her arms around the mayor and physically intervening.

 

She reportedly slammed her forearm into one officer while grabbing another. Such behavior is not just an unfortunate lapse in judgment; it is a dangerous disregard for the safety of law enforcement officers and the rule of law.

Dems vow response to DOJ charges against New Jersey Rep. McIver |  Courthouse News Service

The charges McIver faces are severe. The first two counts carry a maximum prison sentence of eight years each, while the third count carries a maximum sentence of one year.

These are not minor offenses. They reflect the seriousness of the charges against McIver, who, in her role as a member of Congress, should have known better than to involve herself in such a chaotic and disruptive act.

Her behavior is a direct challenge to law enforcement, and it sets a dangerous precedent for other politicians who may be tempted to use their political influence to obstruct justice.

McIver’s attorney, Paul Fishman, has attempted to deflect the charges by calling the indictment “political retaliation.” In a statement to Fox News, Fishman claimed that McIver was being targeted by the Trump administration because of her political views and her role as a public servant.

However, this defense rings hollow when one considers the facts of the case. McIver’s actions were not motivated by a desire to peacefully protest or engage in constructive political discourse; they were motivated by a reckless disregard for the law and an attempt to interfere with federal law enforcement.

The irony here is undeniable. While McIver and her Democratic colleagues accuse the Trump administration of political retaliation, it is clear that their own actions are the result of a deep-seated political agenda designed to obstruct the work of law enforcement officers.

In fact, the Democrats have shown time and time again that they are willing to ignore the rule of law when it suits their political objectives. Whether it is blocking immigration enforcement or undermining the work of federal agents, the Democratic Party’s commitment to law and order is increasingly in question.

The situation surrounding McIver’s indictment also highlights the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party when it comes to issues of law enforcement.

Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted on federal charges over clash with law  enforcement at ICE facility in New Jersey

On one hand, Democrats claim to support law enforcement and the rule of law; on the other, they are all too willing to engage in behavior that disrupts law enforcement efforts when they believe it will serve their political purposes.

McIver’s actions in Newark are a clear example of this double standard. By obstructing the arrest of Mayor Baraka, she is sending a message that the laws that govern all Americans don’t apply to her or her political allies.

This indictment comes at a time when the Trump administration is fighting to enforce immigration laws and restore order in cities across the country.

President Trump has been unrelenting in his efforts to ensure that federal law enforcement is able to carry out its duties without interference. In the face of violent protests and lawless behavior in cities like Los Angeles, Trump has deployed National Guard troops and Marines to restore peace and prevent further chaos.

The Democrats, on the other hand, have fought tooth and nail to block these efforts, choosing to side with those who engage in criminal behavior rather than law-abiding citizens and law enforcement officers.

The Trump administration’s actions are a necessary response to the lawlessness that has become all too common in American cities. In Los Angeles, protests have turned violent, with demonstrators setting cars on fire and attacking police officers.

In Newark, McIver’s actions were part of a broader attempt to undermine the rule of law by obstructing federal officers carrying out their duties. In both cases, the Democrats have shown a complete lack of respect for the law and have sided with those who wish to destroy the fabric of American society.

The GOP’s stance on this issue could not be clearer: law and order must be maintained, and those who disrupt the peace must be held accountable.

Democrat LaMonica McIver wins special election to succeed late Rep. Donald  Payne Jr. • New Jersey Monitor

President Trump and his allies are unwavering in their commitment to ensuring that America remains a nation governed by the rule of law, not by the whims of political agitators.

The indictment of Rep. McIver is just one example of how the Democratic Party’s actions are undermining the safety and security of American citizens, and it should serve as a wake-up call to the American people about the dangers posed by the Democrats’ increasingly radical agenda.

It is important to note that while McIver may claim that her actions were in the name of protest, there is a fundamental difference between peaceful protest and obstruction of justice.

The Democratic Party has consistently shown that it is willing to engage in political theater at the expense of public safety. Whether it’s blocking federal immigration agents from doing their jobs or obstructing law enforcement efforts in cities across the country, the Democrats’ actions are an affront to the values that have made America great.

In conclusion, the indictment of Rep. LaMonica McIver is a stark reminder of the Democrats’ dangerous disregard for the rule of law. McIver’s behavior outside the Newark immigration facility, where she allegedly obstructed federal officers during the attempted arrest of Mayor Baraka, is not just a personal failing—it is a reflection of the broader problems within the Democratic Party.

By prioritizing political gain over public safety and the rule of law, the Democrats are showing that they are more interested in sowing division and chaos than in upholding the principles that make America a land of justice and order.

House Democrats vow to "respond vigorously" to McIver's DOJ charges

President Trump’s administration, by contrast, has shown that it is willing to take decisive action to protect American citizens and restore law and order. The indictment of McIver is just one of many signs that the Democratic Party’s radical agenda is doing more harm than good, and it is time for America to choose leadership that prioritizes the rule of law over political gamesmanship.