Zohran Mamdani’s Anti-Private Property Stance Sparks National Outrage

Zohran Mamdani, the leading candidate in the New York City mayoral race, is facing a wave of criticism after a resurfaced video showed him expressing support for abolishing private property in New York City.

The video clip, which has been widely shared, captures Mamdani, a self-proclaimed communist and the surprise primary winner over former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, advocating for radical changes to property ownership in the city.

In the clip, Mamdani argues that the current housing system is deeply flawed and leaves too many people without homes. He explained his position by saying, “My platform is that every single person should have housing, and I think faced with these two options, the system has hundreds of thousands of people unhoused, right? For what?” His statement was clear: the existing system, in his view, is failing the people of New York.

Mamdani went on to say that if there were a system that guaranteed housing for everyone, even if it meant abolishing private property or implementing a statewide housing guarantee, that system would be preferable to the current conditions in the city.

He pushed back against critics by saying, “People try and play like gotcha games about these kinds of things, and it’s like, look, I care more about whether somebody has a home.”

These statements have sparked outrage, particularly among conservatives. U.S. Representative Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) was quick to criticize Mamdani’s comments.

She condemned his embrace of ideas that she said come straight from communist ideology. “He claims to be a socialist, whether it’s wanting to abolish private property or wanting to seize the means of production, these are communist ideas right out of the playbook of Karl Marx,” Malliotakis said in an interview with Fox News.

Malliotakis expressed concern that the media and the Democratic Party are not holding Mamdani accountable for his extreme views. She warned that many New Yorkers might not be aware of the full extent of Mamdani’s political beliefs and that if they knew more, they would reject him outright.

Malliotakis has personal experience with the dangers of communism; her mother fled Cuba to escape the oppressive communist regime there. “The fact that too many members of the media, too many members of the Democrat Party, are willing to go along instead of calling him out on it is disturbing,” she said.

“I think that if the majority of New Yorkers knew what this guy truly stands for and how destructive and dangerous his policies are, there’s no way that they vote for him, because so many in our city fled places where socialism and communism destroyed their lives.”

Mamdani has a history of supporting communist and anti-American ideas. One example that critics often point to is a social media post he shared in December 2020, celebrating the election of a young communist mayor in India.

The post originally came from an official communist party account and read, “Comrade Arya Rajendran, age 21 new Mayor of Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. She will be the youngest mayor of a major city in the world.

Here she leads a detachment of Red Volunteers.” Mamdani added his own endorsement by reposting the message and writing, “Them: what kind of mayor does NYC need right now?” His comment was widely interpreted as an endorsement of similar leadership for New York City.

Mamdani has also proposed policies that critics say would severely damage the city’s economy, especially for small businesses. He has pledged to introduce government-run grocery stores throughout the city.

Under his plan, each of the five boroughs would have at least one state-run grocery store aimed at reducing food insecurity. However, this idea has been met with resistance because government-run stores are typically associated with communist economies, and many fear that such a system would harm the city’s beloved small businesses and bodegas.

These stores operate with very slim profit margins, typically between one and three percent, and the presence of government competition could drive them out of business.

Adding to the controversy, Mamdani’s personal background has also come under scrutiny. He only became a U.S. citizen eight years ago, and even his own mother has commented on his complex identity. In an interview with the Hindustan Times, his mother, filmmaker Mira Nair, said of her son, “He is not an American at all.

He was born in Uganda, raised between India and America. He is at home in many places. He thinks of himself as a Ugandan and as an Indian.” This statement has led critics to question Mamdani’s loyalty and his understanding of American values.

President Donald Trump has weighed in on the controversy as well. He criticized Mamdani’s anti-private property stance and his vow to defy federal immigration enforcement. In a recent statement, Trump was clear about his position on Mamdani’s plans to ignore federal laws.

“Well, then we’ll have to arrest him,” Trump said when asked about Mamdani’s defiance of federal authority. The president was firm in his stance, saying, “Look, we don’t need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I’m going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation. We send him money, we send him all the things that he needs to run a government.”

The controversy surrounding Mamdani’s comments and political positions has made him a central figure in national discussions about socialism, communism, and the future of American cities.

His campaign for mayor of New York City has become a flashpoint in the broader ideological battle between progressives who advocate for systemic change and conservatives who warn against the dangers of leftist policies.

Mamdani, for his part, has tried to frame his policies as necessary reforms to address inequality and poverty in the city. He argues that the current system leaves too many New Yorkers struggling for basic needs like housing and food, and that bold solutions are required.

However, his opponents argue that the solutions he proposes — abolishing private property, government-run grocery stores, and defying federal law — are too extreme and would lead New York City down a dangerous path.

The debate is likely to continue as Mamdani’s campaign progresses. His comments and proposals are being closely watched by both his supporters and his detractors. The question remains whether New Yorkers will embrace his vision of a radically transformed city or reject it in favor of more traditional policies.

In the meantime, conservative voices like Nicole Malliotakis and President Trump are making sure that voters are aware of what Mamdani stands for. They are using his own words and proposals to paint a picture of a mayoral candidate whose ideas are rooted in communist ideology rather than American democratic values.

Whether or not Mamdani responds directly to these criticisms, the attention on his campaign is unlikely to fade anytime soon. His bold statements, combined with his controversial proposals, have made him one of the most talked-about political figures in the country.

As the mayoral race heats up, voters in New York City will have to decide whether they are ready to embrace Mamdani’s radical vision or if they prefer a different direction for the future of America’s largest city.

Full video: