Tragedy Strikes at 400 Feet as Turkish Airlines Flight Falls Silent Before Impact

   

Generated image

On the morning of February 25, 2009, Turkish Airlines Flight 1951 took off from Istanbul Atatürk Airport on what was scheduled to be a typical training flight to Amsterdam Schiphol. 

The Boeing 737-800 aircraft carried 128 passengers, four cabin crew, and an unusual three-pilot configuration: a senior training captain, a trainee first officer with military background, and a safety pilot tasked with monitoring both. The flight was intended to build experience, not end in disaster.

But less than an hour before landing, one of the most subtle yet catastrophic malfunctions in aviation took root—one that would spiral into a series of human errors, miscommunications, and a final moment of irreversible stall that claimed nine lives.

The aircraft, registered just seven years earlier, was flying smoothly at cruising altitude. Unbeknownst to the crew, a critical sensor was already compromised. The left-hand radio altimeter, responsible for measuring the aircraft’s true height above the ground, began feeding faulty data to the flight control system shortly after takeoff.

At just 400 feet, it was incorrectly reading minus eight feet—essentially tricking the system into thinking the plane was already on the ground. This failure did not show up in pre-flight checks, nor did it trigger any obvious warnings until much later.

OTD in 1991, USAir Flight 1493 (N388US) a Boeing 737-300 collides with SkyWest  Airlines Flight 5569 (N683AV) a Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner while  landing at Los Angeles International Airport before veering into an

The flight data recorder would later confirm that this altimeter glitch was continuous throughout the cruise and descent, lurking in the background like a time bomb.

 

As the descent began, pilots received erratic but brief landing gear warnings. These were not normal for cruise or early approach and should have been a clear red flag. The captain, acting as pilot monitoring, muttered “radio altimeter” in the cockpit, acknowledging the weird reading. But the conversation stopped there. Neither the captain nor the trainee pilot flying the aircraft discussed its implications in any serious way.

There was no checklist followed, no decision to disconnect the autothrottle, and no clear call to switch to manual controls, despite existing Boeing guidance that warned against using autothrottle during known altimeter faults.

Approaching Schiphol, things grew more hectic. Air Traffic Control issued tighter-than-usual vectors for the final approach, aiming to slot Flight 1951 into a busy airspace.

The tight turn and descent left the crew high on the glide slope, forcing a fast and aggressive descent using vertical speed mode instead of allowing the glide slope to capture smoothly. This maneuver added to the pressure and led the captain—who was supposed to supervise—to start manually adjusting autopilot settings.

Watch Mayday: Air Disaster - S9:E4 Cleared for Disaster (USAir Flight 1493/Skywest  Airlines Flight 5569) (2010) Online for Free | The Roku Channel | Roku

In this confusion, the approach mode was activated improperly by the trainee, briefly disconnecting the autopilot, then re-engaged without clear cockpit coordination. Again, no one openly questioned this or discussed it further.

The crew finally intercepted the localizer but remained too high for a normal descent path. The aircraft was still in dual-autopilot configuration, relying on both the captain’s and first officer’s systems.

Yet, due to the faulty left-hand altimeter, the autothrottle assumed the plane had touched down and silently reduced the thrust levers to idle. The engines obeyed. Over the next 98 seconds, the engines stayed at idle while the aircraft quietly bled speed. No one noticed. No one intervened.

This was the turning point.

At the 1,000-foot mark—the landing “gate” where the aircraft should be fully configured for final approach—the checklist was incomplete. The landing gear had only recently been extended, flaps were not yet at 40, the cabin was not verified ready, and crucially, the engines were still at idle.

By procedure, this should have triggered an immediate go-around. But no such call was made. The captain, for reasons unknown, chose to continue the approach, possibly trusting automation or not wanting to break the trainee’s momentum. The safety pilot, though alert to the situation, did not challenge the decision.

32 Years Ago Today: The Los Angeles Runway Disaster

Seconds later, the stick shaker activated violently, signaling an imminent stall. The aircraft had slowed to a dangerous 107 knots—well below its approach speed of 144. The nose was high, the engines were silent, and the aircraft was running out of time.

The safety pilot shouted “Speed! Speed! Speed!” but the thrust levers remained at idle, locked by the still-engaged autothrottle that believed the plane was flaring for landing.

The trainee instinctively pushed the nose down and added throttle, briefly correcting the stall condition. But at that exact moment, the captain announced, “I have control.” In a tragic twist, as he took over, the engines once again returned to idle—still under the grip of the flawed autothrottle.

Within seconds, the nose pitched down too far, and as the engines struggled to spool back up, it was already too late. The 737 entered a full aerodynamic stall at 400 feet. There was no room to recover.

The aircraft slammed into a muddy field just short of the runway, its tail striking first. The fuselage broke into three pieces, the engines were flung hundreds of meters away, and the cockpit crumpled like paper. Nine people, including all three pilots and one flight attendant, died instantly. Dozens more were injured.

Air Crash Investigation on X: "🗓 | 𝗢𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘆 (𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟭): USAir  Flight 1493 collides with SkyWest Airlines Flight 5569 upon landing at Los  Angeles after the ATC had cleared Flight 1493

In the months that followed, the Dutch Safety Board conducted a deep investigation, eventually concluding that the crash was the result of both technical failure and human error. The faulty radio altimeter was undeniably the root cause, causing the autothrottle to reduce thrust at a critical phase of flight.

But investigators were equally critical of the crew’s lack of communication, failure to monitor airspeed, and refusal to call a go-around when procedures demanded it. Boeing was faulted for not issuing stronger cockpit warnings or ensuring that the issue with the altimeter could be diagnosed more clearly in flight.

Turkish Airlines was criticized for procedural lapses in how training flights were supervised and how checklist compliance was enforced under pressure.

Since the tragedy, Boeing has amended pilot training programs to include more aggressive stall-recovery exercises not just at cruise altitudes but on final approach—where the drag and slow-speed handling are most dangerous. Simulator training has also evolved to include low-altitude stalls, something rarely practiced before.

Airlines worldwide, including Turkish, have revised protocols for handling technical failures mid-flight and re-emphasized the authority of all cockpit crew, including the safety pilot, to demand go-arounds when conditions are not right.

But for the families of the victims, no amount of training change can undo the loss. Turkish Airlines Flight 1951 became a symbol of how even a short flight with experienced crew and a healthy airplane can become fatal in the face of subtle technical failures, silent cockpit dynamics, and a few seconds of hesitation too long.

It also serves as a permanent reminder to pilots around the world: you must trust your training more than your automation, because when that automation fails—especially silently—it doesn’t ask for permission, and it doesn’t give second chances.